
Do not allow yourself to be imprisoned by any affection. Keep your solitude. The day, if it ever comes, when you are given true affection there will be no opposition between interior solitude and friendship, quite the reverse. It is even by this infallible sign that you will recognize it. — Simone Weil
“Am I simply…losing my whole self in it all?“ This was the question posed in a recent blog entry by my good friend and fellow blogger. It is a poignant question that has the potential for exposing the soul of one brave enough to ask it and then to honestly seek the answer. In her post, she addressed romantic interests as well as friendships, but the same line of inquiry applies equally to any relationship — marriage, family, friendship, employment, religion, and so on. At what point does blending in and being agreeable cross that line into betraying one’s core values and integrity? How many times should you “take one for the team” before standing up and saying, “I quit!”? To quote one of my own previous posts, how do you know when to close a door?
The answer to any of these questions, of course, is as individual as the person asking them. My recent experience has abounded with similar situations, mostly because I waited far too long before confronting them. (See this post as an example.) In my abundance of caution not to burn bridges prematurely, I have often permitted those bridges to stand long after they were obsolete and unsafe for my emotional travel. I’ve said it before: I value relationships. But it is only fair to insist that they be mutual and healthy to all parties — one of which is me.In the realm of dating and romantic relationships, we seem typically better able to take a stand. But what of other relationships? Friendships seem to give some of us fits. I would venture to say that friendships are the most important of all our relationships, agreeing with Elie Weisel when he said, “Friendship marks a life even more deeply than love. Love risks degenerating into obsession; friendship is never anything but sharing.” I note that he said “sharing,” but nothing of agreeing. So sharing what? I maintain that respect is the primary thing to be shared.
I look back and realize that many of my closest friends have been people with whom I agreed on very little. Three particular friends from college come to mind: Ken, Jeff and David. I had known Ken since the 2nd grade when we became neighbors and best friends. We went on to be roommates for two years at Furman. Since we have the same last name, many thought us to be brothers. David was my freshman roommate, and Jeff was the lovable and weird guy at the end of the hall. I don’t recall exactly how we met Jeff; he was just there one day and then every day thereafter. We all had some important elements in common. But we were vastly different in some critical ways. I recall many heated “debates” over such things as religion, politics, philosophy and so on. I’m sure they remember these as well. An onlooker may have suspected that violence was certain to ensue. But it never did. Respect was the glue that held these relationships together. The result: we learned from each other. I never fully adopted any of their views, but I did take parts of them and blended them into my own. I suspect they did the same, and we were all enriched.
The beauty, then, that friendship offers is the freedom to be oneself and to be respected and accepted for that, while extending the same freedom to the other person. And herein lies, in my estimation, the point at which so many friendships cease to be friendships. I think we figure this out by asking two questions: (1) What am I getting from this relationship? And (2) what is the other person getting from this relationship? The second is often the more revealing, especially if the answers are something like the following:
- This friendship benefits the other because I have a big screen TV and my friend doesn’t.
- This friendship benefits the other because I have a pool in my yard and my friend doesn’t.
- This friendship benefits the other by giving him (or her) someone to feel superior to (rightly or wrongly).
- And so on.
It happens. And when it does, we start to “lose our whole self in it all.”
What about the first question? I read a book recently that brought out the importance of taking inventory of how we’re feeling in different situations. The point was that we frequently are confused about what we think, but we always know clearly whether we feel good or bad — and our feelings give us insight into what we’re thinking. It makes sense, doesn’t it? My litmus test, therefore, is something like this: When with friends (or girlfriends, boyfriends, or whomever), what do you feel? If you’re feeling affirmed for who you truly are (or good), the situation is probably a good one for you, and the relationship is healthy. If you’re not feeling affirmed; or, even worse, if you’re feeling like you have to suppress yourself; or if you’re feeling judged or unfairly criticized on a regular basis (or bad), that relationship may have become toxic, causing you to feel your self becoming lost.
Friendship, I read, ultimately is “an equality made of harmony.” When either of those qualities fades, the friendship, in the truest sense, has ceased — much like a corpse waiting for someone to finally declare it dead. The absence of that declaration, however, makes it no more alive.
We evolve. Our relationships either evolve with us or they die. Shouldn’t we be okay with that? We divorce ourselves (too easily, perhaps) from spouses when it becomes evident that they no longer fit us. Sometimes we have to divorce ourselves from other relationships as well (friendships, jobs, etc.) that no longer fit us in order to be true to ourselves. That act doesn’t discount what was; it merely acknowledges that things have changed. W. Somerset Maugham wrote that “it’s no good trying to keep up old friendships. It’s painful for both sides. The fact is, one grows out of people, and the only thing is to face it.” While I do not agree in full with that statement, I think there occasions in which it is quite apt. On those occasions, I feel a moral responsibility to myself and to what I hold true to walk away, remembering with fondness what used to be, freeing myself from what has become so that I can face what is to be. (It won’t be easy.)
If I have said anything suggestive that I do not value friendship, please understand that quite the opposite was my intent. Nor am I advocating a “zero-tolerance” policy on selfishness lest I condemn myself as well as each of you. My purpose was to explore what friendship is and isn’t — a topic on which volumes have been written. Although this post has been “quote heavy,” I will close with yet one more. This one is from Henri Nouwen, a modern Dutch priest who, to me, brings good sense to matters that others tend to make muddy. On friendship….
When we honestly ask ourselves which person in our lives means the most us, we often find that it is those who, instead of giving much advice, solutions, or cures, have chosen rather to share our pain and touch our wounds with a gentle and tender hand. The friend who can be silent with us in a moment of despair or confusion, who can stay with us in an hour of grief and bereavement, who can tolerate not knowing, not curing, not healing and face with us the reality of our powerlessness, that is a friend who cares. (Henri Nouwen)